Charles Pierce sees it - updated

And he puts it so well: No more fucks to give. More of this, please.

Update: I ask for more, and more arrives. Thank you, sir.

Yes, I know the source

And yes, Lanny Davis is Lanny Davis. But if his facts are correct, this is a compelling argument.

This "-gate" is rusty

Kurt Eichenwald debunks emailgate. Which won't, of course, stop the Times and other CDSers from squeaking.

This is what ready for prime time looks like

It's so clear why people in their law school class at Yale believed that Bill was the one who had won the lottery. She really is the most substantial and smartest person in any room she walks into.

Her obsession is eternal - Updated

Age cannot wither her, nor custom stale her infinite malignity. Maureen Dowd really is a woman possessed, as mad as a hatter and a continuing stain on the New York Times. And now her hatred for Hillary has led to this: she's pimping the absurd and creepy idea that Joe Biden will challenge for the nomination.

I feel sorry for Biden. But when are they going to drag this madwoman away from the podium?

Whatever else this vomititious spew produces, it will make Bob Somersby's pen explode.

Update: And, of course, the obsessive enabler is primarily at fault. The Times itself has a Hillary problem of long standing -- a problem that cannot, it seems, be expunged by the familiar best disinfectant.

Update 2: Bob doesn't disappoint. This is exactly how I react to Dowd's piece. The melodrama, sentimentality and cruelty of claiming that a dying saint used his last breath to warn against the Clinton-devils incarnate is not only a profound slander on Hillary and Bill, but it's also a horribly creepy manipulation of Joe and Beau Biden. One must ask: Have you left no sense of decency, Ms. Dowd? Have you no sense of decency?